"Efficiencies of adopting DevOps practices for application lifecycle management"

By: KINGSTAR

OEMs traditionally used DSP-based hardware, plugged into a PC, for motion control. But new software-based solutions have challenged this approach, claiming equal or better performance at lower cost. How does soft motion really compare to hardware? In this whitepaper, we break it down component-by-component for a down-to-the-dollar cost and performance comparison. Topics covered include: Challenges with the traditional hardware approach How soft motion solves those challenges Performance comparison: calculations, axis control, adding axes and machine vision Cost comparison cost and length, ability to scale, necessary hardware Cost-per-item breakdown showing that soft motion costs 44% less than hardware Learn how software-based motion control actually compares to hardware with real-life scenarios and real-dollar cost comparisons. If you’re considering soft motion, start here.  

By: Archer Software

Development of interfaces and applications meeting the current requirements, both in terms of ergonomics and design and in terms of reliability and performance (UI, UX) is a daunting task. This whitepaper focuses on automotive space demonstrating a wide range of software development edges: building Telematics and ADAS systems, helping clients creating prototypes, creating retail and infotainment apps. Key takeaways from this whitepaper: How to improve pedestrian safety, simulation engine sound How to deepen the expertise in the Automotive field Building mobile apps that will playback the sounds in a handier way How to take readings from the car and playing various sounds via laptop speakers or headphones according to the vehicle acceleration/deceleration